|
ProfileThoseSugars is a new service launched by
BCCM/LMBP in cooperation with Prof. N. Callewaert, Director of the Unit for
Molecular Glycobiology of the host laboratory (Department for Molecular Biomedical
Research (DMBR), VIB – Department of Molecular Biology, Ghent University). The
service provides the analysis of protein-linked glycans, for which Prof. N.
Callewaert and Prof. R. Contreras adapted the technique from the use of polyacrylamide
gel-based sequencers to multicapillary DNA sequencers, which represent the state
of the art today. The protocol – recently published in Nature Protocols (Laroy
et al., 2006) – satisfies the glyco-analytical needs of many projects and can
form the basis of ‘glycomics’ studies, in which robustness, high throughput,
high sensitivity and reliable quantification are of paramount importance.
1. Introduction
Glycosylation is the enzymatic addition of
sugars or oligosaccharides to macromolecules
such as proteins (glycoproteins) and
lipids (glycolipids). In most cases, glycosylation
occurs in the secretory pathway, i.e. in
the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi
apparatus. Consequently, more than 90%
of all secreted and membrane bound proteins
are glycosylated. Together with other
post- and cotranslational modifications,
of which phosphorylation is probably the
most studied, glycosylation helps in diversifying
gene products. Depending on the
protein structure both during and after
folding, specific sites are modified with carbohydrates.
Although all cells in an organism
have the same genomic information,
the physiological state of a specific cell and
its environment will determine what part of
the glycosylation machinery is active. Consequently,
a particular glycoprotein should
not be considered a single entity but rather
as a group of different glycoforms. Different
glycoforms of the same protein may
have different functional, kinetic or physical
properties.
The so-called paradox of glycosylation
states that no specific function can be associated
with a specific carbohydrate structure.
The exact role of a carbohydrate depends
on its interactions with the protein
backbone and with other proteins, carbohydrates
or other types of molecules. Thus
a specific carbohydrate structure can serve
many functions. Obviously, some general
functions can be assigned to specific structures,
but they usually do not tell the whole
story. Terminal sialic acid molecules on glycoproteins
are known to protect them from
clearance from the blood by liver receptors.
However, as part of a larger terminal carbohydrate
structure, it may influence many
other functions or properties of the specific
protein in a specific environment. This illustrates
that, for a full comprehension of
complex life, glycomics may be as essential
as proteomics and genomics. As the condition
of the cell largely controls which part
of the glycosylation machinery is active at
any time, changes in these conditions will
alter the glycosylation. One can also look
at it in another way: the types of glycoconjugates
produced by a cell, tissue or organism
reflect their current physiological state.
In pathology, this knowledge can be used
in two ways. First, these changes can indicate
a certain disease as do changes in the
protein concentration. Second, the altered
glycosylation can be studied as a function
of the pathology. In the former, the focus is
diagnosis whereas, in the latter, the primary
concern is therapy.
Figure 2: Sample preparation
2. Glycosylation in diagnosis
Many diagnostic methods currently used in
the clinic rely on glycosylation changes. For
example, some of the current applications
are based on the occurrence of different isoforms
of a protein. When a charged sugar is
involved, the protein isoforms have different
isoelectric points, which facilitate their
separation and give them predictive value.
For example, specific changes in isoforms
of human transferrin are directly related to
alcohol abuse. Therefore, carbohydrate deficient
transferrin (CDT) is currently used to
monitor alcoholic patients under treatment.
The same thing is true for the detection of
abuse of exogenous erythropoietin (EPO) in
sports. In this case, the test is based on differences
in EPO isoforms between human
endogenous and recombinantly expressed
EPO.
In a recent study on liver disease, the assumption
was made that different active
glycosylation machineries are active in
healthy and diseased hepatocytes (Callewaert
et al., 2004). As the majority of glycoproteins
in the serum are synthesized by
these cells, the total N-glycome of these
proteins may reflect the condition of the
liver. By means of DSA-FACE, total serum
N-glycoprofiles were obtained. Clear changes
in the N-glycan profiles were observed in
cirrhosis. Based on these profiles, the GlycoCirrhoTest
was defined, which allows differentiation
of cirrhosis from non-cirrhotic
chronic hepatitis. A more detailed study of
the glycan profiles revealed delicate changes
in the different fibrosis stadia. Obviously,
this is of considerable clinical importance,
as a biopsy is still the only practical starting
point for grading fibrosis.
3. Glycosylation and therapy
N-glycosylation is one of the most common
post-translational modifications encountered
on biopharmaceuticals. While
the modification is often critical to achieve
efficient folding and secretion of the
glycoprotein drug, its notorious heterogeneity
can hinder efficient downstream
processing and can significantly complicate
the structural characterization of the molecule.
Moreover, the type of N-glycosylation
can have a tremendous impact on the pharmacokinetics
of a drug, as receptors with
affinity for certain carbohydrate types are
present on the liver endothelium and on
hepatocytes, which cause rapîd clearance of
glycoproteins modified with their cognate
carbohydrate ligands. A well-known example
concerns the N-glycosylation of erythropoietin
(EPO), where large multi-antennary
N-glycans are necessary to avoid renal clearance
of this small protein and achieve the
long residence time in the circulation, which
is necessary for therapeutic efficacy. Taking this concept one step further, second-generation
EPO (AraNESP, Amgen) has been
engineered to contain an extra N-glycosylation
site, which makes the glycoprotein molecule
even larger, thus effectively increasing
the circulation time from days to weeks.
4. Tools for N-glycan structural profiling
4.1 Limitations and needs
One of the major current obstacles for the
use of carbohydrates in diagnosis has been
the lack of appropriate analytic techniques.
Carbohydrate recognizing proteins, NMR, Xray
crystallography and mass spectrometry
(MS) all have their limitations. Because the
amount of biological sample available is
frequently small, and because of the characteristics
of oligosaccharides, the perfect
technique for glycodiagnosis should combine
high sensitivity, high resolving power
(including the isomeric and isobaric structures),
high throughput, and low cost (material
and personnel)
Moreover, in biopharmaceutical engineering
campaigns, the availability of robust, highresolution
and high-sensitivity N-glycan
structural profiling tools is of paramount
importance in monitoring production process
variations for their influence on product
N-glycosylation and in ensuring batch-tobatch
reproducibility. High throughput at
relatively low cost and an analytics platform
that can be operated by non-specialist technicians
are certainly desirable features.
4.2 DSA-FACE as the solution
Carbohydrates can be separated electrophoretically
on polyacrylamide gels. To allow detection
and in some cases, to add charge, the
oligosaccharides are fluorescently labeled.
Classical FACE (fluorophore assisted carbohydrate
electrophoresis) allows separation
and detection of oligosaccharides albeit
with relatively low sensitivity and poor resolving
power. A major breakthrough came
when slab gel DNA-sequencing equipment
was successfully used for the profiling and
analysis of oligosaccharides. When an appropriate
dye is used, usually APTS (8-aminopyrene-
1,3,6-trisulfonic acid), DSA-FACE
(DNA-Sequencer Aided FACE) usually allows
separation with high resolution and sensitivity
(Callewaert et al., 2001).
In the DMBR Unit, Molecular Glycobiology,
the workhorse analytical technique is not
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, as in many
other laboratories in this field, but N-glycan
profiling on the Applied Biosystems
gel-based or capillary array-based DNAsequencers,
which are very familiar to any
laboratory that has ever performed DNA-sequencing
or genetic analysis. This method
has enabled N-glycan profiling to become teins and the DNA-sequencing, the latter
being executed by technicians on over
10,000 samples per year on a single 4-capillary
instrument. Samples of glycoproteins are worked up
through an optimized multi-step 96-well
plate-based protocol, and the released Nglycans
are labeled with the fluorophore
8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (originally
developed for carbohydrate labeling
at Beckman), followed by the removal of
the excess label. The protocol has recently
been described in detail (Laroy et al., 2006).
The workflow for sample preparation is provided
in Figure 2. Along similar lines, Prof. N.
Callewaert and his team have been using
N-glycan profiling on DNA-sequencers in
an analysis service for academic scientists
and the biopharmaceutical industry. The
high sensitivity of the integrated analytical
protocols is a very significant advantage of
the method, with 1-5 micrograms of protein
being sufficient to obtain results of exoglycosidase
array sequencing. This enables to
implement N-glycan profiling at a much earlier
stage of cell-line development than has
hitherto been possible. Expertise was gained
for the analysis of MAb N-glycosylation at
an early stage of clone selection (24-well
plate culture scale) for the analysis of MAbs
and total glycoprotein extracts produced in
plants (proteins extracted from parts of single
Arabidopsis plants are sufficient), for the
analysis of N-glycans derived from Westernblotted
protein bands, for recombinant Factor
IX secreted by muscular tissue implants,
for EPO produced in the novel expression
system Leishmania tarentolae, for N-glycosylation
analysis of antigens derived from
parasitic trematodes, and many more other
applications. If structural information on the observed
N-glycans is desired, exoglycosidase array
sequencing, can be performed either on the
total mixture if the major compounds are
of interest, or on HPLC-purified minor compounds
from the mixture. The integration
of a normal phase ion-pairing HPLC option
in our standard workflow allows for such
complete analysis of complex mixtures. An
example is given in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Exoglycosidase sequencing example. The N-glycans from total serum protein of a liver cirrhosis patient
were analyzed upon digestion with mixtures of exoglycosidases. From careful analysis of peak abundances
and mobility shifts between the different panels, the structure of the main components can easily be
derived. For similar analysis of minor compounds in the mixture, prior HPLC separation of the mixture has been
implemented (see Fig. 2).
Contacts
Through the ProfileThoseSugars service BCCM/LMBP offers
customized contract analytical services (specialized in miniaturized comparative
analysis of larger series of samples) built on DSA-FACE technology and performed
by the developers of this technology. For more information, see the website:
http://bccm.belspo.be/about/lmbp.php
Please contact Kristien Neyts at Kristien. Neyts@dmbr.UGent.be.
In concert with Prof. N. Callewaert and his team, she will be happy to discuss
your glycoanalysis requirements and advise you on the most appropriate strategies
and the options suitable for your specific applications.
Literature
- Callewaert, N. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of liver
cirrhosis using DNA sequencer-based total serum protein glycomics. Nature
Medicine 10, 429-434, 2004.
- Callewaert N, Geysens S, Molemans F, Contreras R.
Ultrasensitive profiling and sequencing of N-linked oligosaccharides using
standard DNA-sequencing equipment. Glycobiology 11, 275-81, 2001.
- Laroy W, Contreras R, Callewaert N. Glycome mapping
on DNA sequencing equipment. Nature Protocols 1, 397-405, 2006.
|
• Kristien Neyts
• Martine Vanhoucke
• Prof. Dr. Rudi Beyaert |
BCCM/LMBP Plasmid collection,
Department of Molecular Biology,
Ghent University
Technologiepark 927,
B-9052 Gent- Zwijnaarde
|
|